topcurve


DataDome Blog

middle curve

Archive for June, 2007

Country Rankings of “Whiney Workers”

Monday, June 11th, 2007

According to an FDS International study of work attitudes across 23 countries, and including nearly 14,000 workers, the United States ranks 4th in “whiney” workers. A “whiney worker” is unhappy and/or demanding about pay, actual income relative to cost of living, average number of weekly work hours, and work impinging on their private life.

Here’s the lineup.

  1. France
  2. United Kingdom (tie)
  3. Sweden (tie)
  4. United States
  5. Australia (tie)
  6. Portugal (tie)
  7. Canada(tie)
  8. Greece(tie)
  9. Poland
  10. Germany (tie)
  11. Spain (tie)

Where are the “least whiney” workers? Ireland, the Netherlands and Thailand.

The Netherlands has the highest morale, and Irish and Thai workers rank second. Japan has the lowest.

Russian workers were most likely to complain about their pay (61%), compared to 43% of Chinese workers, 40% of British workers, and 38% of American workers who expressed dissatisfaction with their compensation. Workers in Ireland and the Netherlands were least likely to complain about their pay.

British workers are demanding about holidays; despite having 33.5 leave days and public holidays.
Only 13% of Irish workers whine about holidays, despite having fewer of them.

“…after France, Britain, and Sweden, the world’s biggest workplace whiners are Americans, despite their having by far the highest levels of income relative to their cost of living. Compare them to Thai workers: while real levels of income are more eight times higher in the United States, more workers in the US feel their pay is a problem than in Thailand.”

(via HR BLR)

Observations:

They weren’t shy on the value judgment of people who participated in the study and expressed honest information. Of course “whiney workers” is catchier, but why not look at it as targeted information that could be used to improve morale, productivity, loyalty and talent retention?

I also see a problem in that we have no indication of any sort of demographic breakdown by job position or class, which would affect the interpretation of results. What is the context? In some places, there may be simple gratitude about having a job, any job, and there is certainly a wide range of available social “safety net” options in different countries and class levels.

What might be the impact of cultural difference? For instance, would people in different places view complaining, demanding, or even sharing negative information differently? Is there any gender difference? Urban vs more rural? Service or manufacturing? Are they comparing apples to oranges in the study?

How would you discriminate between “whining” and the simple expression of real-life problems may have about such things as working too many hours for the pay, or having your job impinge too much on your private life?

Are such studies attempting to say, in effect, “be happy with what you have, there are people worse off than you are” – comparable to the way mothers used to get children to eat food they didn’t like? If so, that strategy isn’t going to work as the talent shortage heats up. U.S. companies that take such an attitude will simply cease to be competitive.

Retention Tip: Develop Trustworthy Managers

Wednesday, June 6th, 2007

Approximately 32% of a worker’s desire to stay or go is the result of feeling or not feeling trust towards their boss. An employee’s longevity with a company directly correlates with how much they trust their immediate manager or boss. The extent to which an employee trusts their direct boss directly relates to their desire to spend their career with a company.

People tend to trust their direct boss a bit more than they trust top management.

  • 34% of people strongly trust their direct boss.
  • 35% moderately trust their direct boss.
  • The remaining 31% range from not trusting to strongly distrusting their direct boss.
  • Only 20% of people strongly trust the top management of their organization.
  • 36% moderately trust their top management.
  • The remaining 44% range from not trusting to strongly distrusting their top management.

Specific trust issue predictors for employee loyalty and retention:

  1. By far the most important factor is that their direct boss responds constructively when employees share a work-related problem (26% of wanting to stay or go).
  2. The direct boss makes smart decisions (adds another 3%).
  3. The direct boss is honest and truthful (adds another 2%).
  4. The direct boss helps employees grow and develop professionally (adds another 1%).
  5. Employees receive consistent direction from their immediate supervisor.

[Data from the Leadership IQ organizational trust study, which polled 7,209 executives, managers and employees.]

How do you find out whether your managers meet these predictive factors? Ask the people who report directly to them! Ask your employees specific questions, using a third party survey provider that can provide complete anonymity (Many employees, understandably, will not provide honest – useful – information unless they can be sure that their answers cannot be held against them in the workplace). Data Dome provides surveys to assess all aspects of organizational culture vitality, and trending surveys are also available, so that you can validate successful changes.

How do you hire and develop trustworthy managers that will fulfill the terms of these predictive factors? Use the proper validated assessments as part of your hiring process. Run 360-degree surveys to get the complete picture on their performance (make sure that survey questions are specific and validated). Invest in professional development and communication training.

How can you build trust toward top management? Communicate your vision better, include bottom-up on-the-ground information insights in the planning process. Make sure that employees understand how they fit into the organization and how they affect the bottom line.

If, in fact, your employees are correct to mistrust top management, it is long past time to confront and reshape the ethical values of the organization. Your top resource is the talent that drives the business and enables it to thrive and grow. As the skilled workforce shortage has an increasing impact, you’re going to need to be able to attract the best talent – and to do so in a much more competitive environment.

Are You Offering a Competitive Salary?

Wednesday, June 6th, 2007

Salary Search is a new resource to determine the full range of salaries a job position is commanding – all the way from the top 10th to the bottom 10th percentile. Offered by the Compensation wing of Business and Legal Reports (BLR), it currently offers information on 2400 job titles.

“We have been collecting compensation information from thousands of companies each year for decades,” says BLR’s founder and CEO Robert L. Brady, “But previously we issued this data only in a lengthy report exclusively for employers. SalarySearch.com is a logical new use of this massive database.”

An employer or employee can receive one free salary report.

“This information helps employers know they’re paying competitively so they can acquire and retain the best talent, but without overpaying,” notes Baker. “Meanwhile, jobseekers and current employees know what to ask in job applications, performance reviews, and salary increase discussions. So when the boss says, ‘what are you looking for?,’ workers can back up their answer with comparative data.”

Non-profits Need to Develop Talent

Monday, June 4th, 2007

A preliminary report issued by the Conference Board has found that non-profits – whose growth is currently outpacing the rest of the economy – will likely be hit hard by the talent shortage just when it needs talent the most.

The demographic of the retiring baby-boomers affects almost all sectors, but executive-level and leadership skill shortages are already disproportionately affecting service sectors such as healthcare and social services. As non-profits grow, there are fewer skilled people to step up to the plate.

The Conference Board report suggests that non-profits need to invest more than they have in human resource management, and in developing younger leaders.

We would add that in addition to internal professional development, non-profits also need tools to identify talent from the start – and to employ effective strategies to retain the talent that they have developed.